Low-VOC Identification Marking (LM)
Project Number: J-95-OC-005

JG-PP partnered with the ESTCP to demonstrate/validate this project. The goal of ESTCP is to demonstrate and validate promising, innovative technologies/processes/materials that target the DoD's most urgent environmental needs. By use of a coordinated effort, ESTCP advances can lead to successful JG-PP technology transitions that will provide cost effective, environmental technology solutions for both the DoD and the U.S. industrial base. Visit the ESTCP website for additional information on the project's purpose, description, and benefits.

Current ink and paint formulations used for identification marking at DoD facilities and at LM in Orlando, Florida, contain solvents that provide desirable properties, such as reduced viscosity for easier application. However, some of the solvents present in current ink and paint formulations, as well as the liquid and solid wastes generated as a result of using these formulations, are considered to be hazardous and are subject to increasing environmental regulation. In addition to the increased operating costs imposed by these regulations (e.g., hazardous waste disposal), stenciling, stamping, and silk screening with current ink and paint formulations are very labor intensive, have the potential to produce illegible results, allow for possible operator error in entering number strings, and may be associated with potential operator health issues.

JG-PP initiated the Low-VOC Identification Marking project to address these issues. VOCs, such as MEK and toluene as found in paint and epoxy resin-based inks, were identified as the target HazMats to be eliminated or reduced. A broad spectrum of parts is being addressed, including mechanical hardware and electronic components. Alternatives being tested include alternative ink stenciling and self-adhesive labeling. Validation testing is complete, and the results are documented in the JTR.

The financial impact of implementing the alternatives was measured at two commercial facilities and four DoD sustainment facilities. The results of the preliminary cost analysis showed a potential cost avoidance of approximately $1 million per year at the six facilities and a $11 million net present value over the 15-year study period. Additionally, this project has the potential to eliminate 1,300 lb/yr VOC emissions and 9,800 lb/yr hazardous waste at these facilities alone, with additional technology migration possible.

Demonstration of an alternative ink occurred at TYAD. Label alternatives were implemented at NADEP-JAX and Point Mugu. Raytheon AFP-44 also implemented alternatives based on results from the JTR.

This site last updated February 28, 2008.